I have created my own video channel on YouTube, which I named “Valery Morozov. Dialogue of Civilisations”.
For a long time, I didn’t want to create a video channel because preparing materials for it is very time-consuming, and I have extremely little free time. However, circumstances compelled me.
Technology is developing rapidly and is becoming an increasingly dominant factor in the development of human society, states, and civilizations, and the video-based information exchange system has already become the main information channel.
At the same time, the understanding of what is happening among those who broadcast on television or YouTube is lacking. Moreover, this lack of understanding of current events shapes the policies of many countries, including Europe, the US and Russia and other countries of the former USSR. Therefore, I often want to say at least a few words, but phrases like “come to your senses” or “wise up” are clearly not enough. It is necessary to explain the essence of what is happening, at least a little, to outline it, and then conduct a serious analysis.
Written analytical materials are necessary, but writing them takes a lot of time; I want to write more deeply and clearly, which not only consumes time but also requires narrowing down the very subject of analysis, the topic itself.
Therefore, I decided to open my channel in both Russian and English, to post short messages, remarks, and comments on pressing topics there. Let these remarks and messages provide answers to questions not very detailed, not very deep, but the video channel will allow me to react promptly to ongoing events.
And later, I will summarize, consolidating my thoughts in articles. What do you think about this?
So, my first material is about why I named the video channel “Valery Morozov. Dialogue of Civilisations”?
The new world order is being created as a system based on the interaction and dialogue of civilizations.
Not just rivalry, not a struggle for principles and ideals, for the predominance of one state or a group of states, one nation, one civilization over others, but interaction between them and the defense of their pragmatic interests.
States and the world as a whole are transitioning to the principles of interaction used by transnational corporations.
Not technologies and production are created, developed, and subordinated to the interests of state and public structures, clans, factions, classes, or political parties, but state and public structures are created, reformed, and developed in the interests of scientific ideas, cultural development, technologies, and production.
Intellect and creativity are becoming the main driving force.
Not military technologies and production are created and developed for the interests of defense departments, the government officials managing them, and the main branches of the armed forces, but the armed forces are developed and transformed based on new ideas and technologies, upon which production is built.
Not unipolarity, bipolarity, or multipolarity, but a cartel-style model of world governance, built not on shared values but on coinciding interests.
A combination of strategic duopolies is being created as an alliance of great civilizations that do not trust each other but are willing to interact and need new rules of the game acceptable to each.
A new global financial system is being created, combining multiple currencies, including crypto, and financial subsystems that form around technologies and production, not states and financial institutions. Not monetary interest is laid as the foundation for development, but money is created for, around, and to ensure the implementation of ideas, technologies, and production.
The UN and other international organizations are obsolete and dying out. A new League of governing civilizations—the Big Four: the USA, Russia, China, India. This League is open to other civilizations capable of growing to the level of the Big Four.
However, there is another reason, and this reason is that representatives of different civilizations understand each other poorly, and on some issues, they do not understand each other at all.
And there are good reasons for this misunderstanding. These reasons will be the subject of one of my next materials, titled “The Surikov Effect.”